Correcting Wrong ‘Playwright’s Advantage over Selenium” Part 11: Wrap-Up

Avoid being fooled.

This is the final part of correcting wrong (ALL WRONG) claims in “Playwright vs Selenium: What Advantages Make Playwright the Winner in Automation Testing Battle 🏆” video.

• “Playwright is Modern and Faster than Selenium” 😒
• “Playwright has Parallel Execution Support” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has Native Auto-Waiting Mechanism” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has a native test runner” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has native HTML Reporters” 👎🏽
• “Playwright Features Can be Configured in one Configuration” 👎🏽
• “Playwright supports a range of Testing Types, e.g. API Testing, Component Testing, …” 👎🏽
• “Playwright UI Mode, CodeGen, Debugging support.” 👎🏽
• “Playwright ARIA locator support” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has frequent releases” 👎🏽
• Wrap-Up

In Part 1 (a Meidum-boosted article), published on 2024–01–25, I provided an example of how China International Capital Corporation (CICC), the leading financial firm in China, completely missed the mark with all its 10 predictions or judgments.