Correcting Wrong “Playwright’s Advantage over Selenium” Part 4: “Playwright has a native test runner”

It is more a Con, not a Pro.

Continue to correct the fourth wrong claim in this YouTube video, “Playwright vs Selenium: What Advantages Make Playwright the Winner in Automation Testing Battle 🏆”.

This article series:

• “Playwright is Modern and Faster than Selenium” 😒
• “Playwright has Parallel Execution Support” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has Native Auto-Waiting Mechanism” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has a native test runner” 👎🏽
• “Playwright has native HTML Reporters” 👎🏽
• “Playwright Features Can be Configured in one Configuration” 👎🏽
• “Playwright supports a range of Testing Types, e.g. API Testing, Component Testing, …” 👎🏽
• “Playwright ARIA locator support” 👎🏽
• “Playwright UI Mode, CodeGen, Debugging support.” 👎🏽

Table of Contents:
· Claim 4: “Playwright has native playwright tests”
· I don’t like “npx playwright test” runner
· There are good reasons why most automation frameworks do not provide their runners.
∘ Why should Automation and Test Syntax Frameworks remain loosely coupled?
· The…